Posted by Lou Pilder on November 27, 2015, at 10:04:57
In reply to Lou's request to Mr.Hsiung-hate being seen as good, posted by Lou Pilder on November 26, 2015, at 10:23:29
> > > > > I would assume that if something is brought to Dr. Bob's attention and he does nothing that he thought it was not against the rules. But that doesn't mean he agrees with what was said.
> > > >
> > > > Right:
> > > >
> > > > > The only messages I take responsibility for are my own.
> > >
> > > I should revise that. I might consider something against the rules, yet decide not to intervene. I want to be free to use my judgment. If you would try to accept what I decide and to trust that I'm doing my best to be fair and to do what I think will be good for this community as a whole, I'd really appreciate it.
> > >
> > > Bob
> > Mr. Hsiung,
> > Was there not a series of posts here in discussion? If so, where have all the posts of such gone?
> > Lou PIlder
> Mr. Hsiung,
> I want all the anti-Semitic propaganda allowed to be seen as being supportive by you here to be immediately sanctioned in accordance with your enforcement policy in your TOS.
> Be advised, that the harm that could come from here by readers seeing a psychiatrist saying that he could leave anti-Semitism to stand when it is against his own rules because he wants readers to trust him at that in that by doing so it will be good for his community as a whole so he thinks, could cause a subset of readers to think that you are crating and developing anti Jewish feelings among your readers by allowing hatred toward the Jews to be seen here as civil by you.
> I ask:
> You say that you are using your judgment to leave hatred toward the Jews here to be seen as being supportive by you. What is this in your mind that constitutes that by you doing ,your community will be improved and what is the improvement?
> Why are you using discrimination, which is an abuse of power, when you say that you can leave my notifications outstanding where your rule is that you will act on notifications except for mine which can result in two sets of rules here by you that dehumanizes me and other Jews as not being worthy of the equal protection of your rules here and debases and degraders the human condition so that Jews could become the victims of hate here. You say that you are using fairness in the administration of your site and ask for readers to trust you at that. How could discrimination be fair? And what rational reader would blindly follow someone that allows hate to be seen as civil?
> Lou Pilder
In regards to you sanctioning the outstanding notifications of mine where anti-Semitic propaganda is seen as being supportive by you, instead of sanctioning per your TOS enforcement policy of placing your please be civil tag line to those posts, I would want for you to open the post and type right down on the post something like:
It could appear that I am condoning the anti-Semitic propaganda in this post because I am allowing it to be seen as being supportive because being supportive takes precedence. I realize that by me allowing the hate to be seen that way, that hatred toward the Jews could actually be incited by me as readers could think that I am validating the hate for my own purposes and that also the deputies of record are in concert with me as well as the poster of the hate.
This is illegal in some European countries if I am seen as condoning the furthering of National Socialist ideology. And since I post the swastika and an image of what could be considered to be the death camps by the National Socialists, I am accepting the opportunity that Lou here is giving me to apologize for allowing these anti-Semitic statements to be seen as that they will be good for my community as a whole by me allowing them to be seen as supportive, for hatred toward the Jews could be incited from this site if the anti-Semitic statements are allowed to be seen as being good for this community as a whole by me.