Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Lou's reply-the intent SLS

Posted by Lou Pilder on March 31, 2015, at 17:00:42

In reply to Re: Lou's reply to Scott-Ihndok Lou Pilder, posted by SLS on March 29, 2015, at 7:41:04

> > > > Hi, Lou.
> > > >
> > > > > The request by me to Robert was out of character to the mission of this forum
> > > >
> > > > What is the mission of this forum?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > - Scott
> > >
> > > Scott,
> > > You asked as to what the mission of this forum is.
> > > The mission of this forum could be deduced by different readers as to what their knowledge is concerning what can be seen here. I am prevented from posting what I see as the mission here due to the prohibitions posted to me here by Mr. Hsiung. Those prohibitions prevent me from showing the history and development of psychiatric drugs and the relationship of psychiatry and mass-murder and support. They also prevent me from posting from a Jewish perspective as revealed to me, which if I was not prohibited by Mr. Hsiung to post such, it would be plainly visible what the mission of this forum is from my perspective.
> > > Lou
> >
> > Scott,
> > Now that you know that there are prohibitions posted to me here by Mr. Hsiung that prevent me from posting from a Jewish perspective as revealed to me, then since the mission of the forum includes that prohibition to me, a distortion could occur here as to how one perceives the mission here because only certain perspectives can be seen here.
> I think I understand your trepidations and motivations to question the civility and sociological ramifications of allowing an ancient post in the Faith forum to remain intact and without comment by the moderator of this forum.
> Would you recognize antisemitism were it to appear in more recent posts? Are there any such posts?
> Out of curiosity, what is Dr. Bob's reasons for not excising the posts that you are concerned with?
> - Scott

You asked about Mr. Hsiung's reasons for allowing the anti-Semitic statements to stand to be seen as supportive.
Mr. suing states that being supportive takes precedence and that if it is not civil to not post it and members are to be civil at all times. e further states tat if a statement stands, it is not against is rules.
This brings up as to what a reasonable reader could think as to what Mr. Hsiung's intent is to allow anti-Semitism to be seen ere as supportive. Mr. Hsiung further states that he in his thinking is doing what will be good for this community as a whole, and further, that readers are to try to trust him at that because he uses fairness and the Golden Rule in his administration of this forum.
Now let's go on...




Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post

Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.


Start a new thread

Google www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:Lou Pilder thread:1077800