Posted by Lou Pilder on December 29, 2008, at 14:18:45
In reply to Re: Lou's request for rationales-, posted by Dinah on December 29, 2008, at 13:34:52
> Dr. Bob is aware of the deputy action. If he wishes to revise it, he can.
>
> I wrote a reply to Dena. It apparently was not received by Dena. I don't know what happened. I resent it.Dinah,
You wrote,[...is aware of..actions...].
I am unsure if he is aware of or not aware of your {rationale(s)} that I have requested as to what you used that determines that those in question could be led to feel put down/accused by that Dena posted about writings from around 500 years ago.
If I was to know you rationale(s) used here, then I could have the opportunity to respond here accordingly and if Mr. Hsiung posts here of your rationale(s) used in question here, if he knows of them, then I could have the opportunity to post my response here.
I am asking that if you made him known of your rationales that you also either post the rationales requested here or ask him to post them here for you, or some other way that myself and the interested members could be made known of the rationale(s) that you used here that I have requested to know of. I base this in part that the TOS here as I understand the TOS is that the administration will post their rationale(s) used if members ask them to do so. That is one reason why I am asking that the sanction to Dena for what is in question be redacted until the rationale(s) requested be posted, either by you or Mr. Hsiung or someone else that you ask to quote you.
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:863266
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20081228/msgs/871305.html