Posted by Lou Pilder on August 4, 2005, at 11:56:20
In reply to Re: Lou wants a link? » Lou Pilder, posted by AuntieMel on August 4, 2005, at 11:12:17
It is written here,[...two were deemed acceptable...the third wasn't pbc'd or asked to be rephrased...].
Looking at the links offered by the poster for this, I am finding that Dr. Hsiung did request the poster to be civil. But looking at it, I can not determine which posts are in consideration.
OTOH, if a post was left without Dr. Hsiung writing that it was either acceptable or not, then It is my understanding that it has not been deemed to be acceptable because there are other posts here that have not been addressed by Dr. Hsiung that I have requested for him to write a determination as to if it is acceptable or not and I remember him reply to my question to him as to how one could know if the statement in question was acceptable or not if he did not address it one way or the other and I remember him writing something like,[...you can't...].
With his reply to me in that respect, it is my understanding that those type of posts are not counted in the "3". And anyway, I do not believe that I have requested a 4th in relation to anyone here.
Dr. Hsiung did write that I could deal with posts that IMO are defaming to me and such that are posted by those with "3" by seeking alternatives. I have emsiled Dr. Hsiung for months about popsts that I request a detremination from him. I have not seen an email reply from him to me about those.
I can not post requests for determinations from posts that are from those posters of "3", nor have I been successfull in emailing Dr. Hsiung for him to reply to me with a determination.
I am requesting for anyone here to advise me of a way that they think could be used under these circumstatnces.