Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: Lou's reply to a_k-htorms Lou Pilder

Posted by alexandra_k on June 15, 2005, at 19:47:40

In reply to Lou's reply to a_k-htorms alexandra_k, posted by Lou Pilder on June 15, 2005, at 19:28:29

I think I understand that your posts are attempts at discovery. That you are trying to better understand the civility rules. That you consider that requesting frequent determinations are the best way that you can go about doing that.

So the 'hit' 'false alarm' terminology wasn't really appropriate - and I apologise for that.

If you want to know what Dr Bob thinks about whether a post is civil or not, rather than just informing him of a post that you do consider uncivil, then why can't you do the former via email?

I think...
The admin board is supposed to be more for the latter kind of case.
The former is very time consuming... Can you see that it might take a lower priority with respect to time management? That might be why you have to wait for a response sometimes.

Maybe there could be a 'civility determinations' mailing list for people who want to participate???
For people who think there is a benefit to the process.

I'm not sure that headway is being made.
Do you really think that asking for determinations is helping you understand the civility rules any better?




Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post

Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.


Start a new thread

Google www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:alexandra_k thread:423270