Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Lou offers clarification Kali Munro

Posted by Lou Pilder on October 5, 2004, at 20:47:04

In reply to Partly Cloudy, posted by Kali Munro on October 5, 2004, at 20:01:45

There are some things that I would like to clarify in what has been posted in this discussion about my posting style.
First, there is the posts about the 100 posts. The reason that I wrote that it would take me 100 posts to unveil or unfold what was folded over was and still is because there is a {great deal of folds over what is visible that you may not be able to see untill there is an unfolding.}
You see, the discussion was between me and Dr. Hsiung and others about Jean Jaque Rousseau and the writings by him that appear on the faith board's opening page. There is a great complex overfolding there and I would need 100 posts to reveal why the writings by Jean Rousseau could have the potential to not only arrouse anti christian feelings, but I could show the potential for Jean Rousseau's writings to be reflected in the phylosophys of Hitler, Stalin Mao, Lenin and others. Then, after the 100 posts, what I would want to write could have the potential for others to consider that the writings by Jean Rousseau might not be appropriate to be posted on a mental health forum. I had asked the moderator to delete those posts by Jean Rousseau in order that I not need to post the 100 posts to reveal what the potential for Jean Rousseau's posts on the faith board have the potential to say in relation to arrousing the potential of putting down those of faiths like christians and others. I would need 100 post because that is how complex those writings are in relation to the goals of the board. Is it supportive for that discussion, which was on the administrative board where it belongs, to be limited or restricted in style of posting? Could not the rule be started after that thread was finished? Would not it be better to continue the discussion so that I could give others infomation so that they could have more light on the subject in order for them to make an informitive decision about if the writings by Jean Rousseau wer or were not supportive for a faith board on a mental health forum?




Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post

Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.


Start a new thread

Google www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:Lou Pilder thread:398972