Posted by zazenducke on June 13, 2012, at 13:01:06
In reply to Re: Lou's request-objkwreezunz » Lou Pilder, posted by SLS on June 13, 2012, at 6:22:47
Is it polite to critique a poster's politeness and announce your hypothetical refusal to answer if the magic word is not included? Please don't answer. Thanks in advance.
> I think that using the word "please" would have been more polite when asking so much of someone. Speaking for myself, I would refuse to do as you ask without it.
> I much prefer the writing style you exercised in your previous post. It was easier for me to follow. I found it lucid and logical, and it showcased your high intelligence.
> > 1. If you do not see any objective reasons;
> > a. then there are none
> > b. there could be objective reasons
> > c. it has not been established that Phillipa has an ongoiing worry
> > d. ongoing worries are not always objective
> > e. objective worries are seldom ongoing
> > f. Phippa's reasoning is objective because what can be seen is what it is.
> > g. none of the above
> > h. all of the above
> > h2 Phillipa's needs are not defined here
> > h3 Phillipa's needs have not been in question here
> > h4 Phillipa needs to know what these needs could be, if any so she could have the opportunity to post what she thinks about what you wrote concerning her.
> > k. some of the above which are _______________
> > Lou
> - Scott