Posted by SLS on June 13, 2012, at 6:22:47
In reply to Lou's request-objkwreezunz » Twinleaf, posted by Lou Pilder on June 12, 2012, at 20:55:59
> I am unsure as to what you are wanting to mean here. If you could post answers to the following, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly. Choose the best answer
I think that using the word "please" would have been more polite when asking so much of someone. Speaking for myself, I would refuse to do as you ask without it.
I much prefer the writing style you exercised in your previous post. It was easier for me to follow. I found it lucid and logical, and it showcased your high intelligence.
> 1. If you do not see any objective reasons;
> a. then there are none
> b. there could be objective reasons
> c. it has not been established that Phillipa has an ongoiing worry
> d. ongoing worries are not always objective
> e. objective worries are seldom ongoing
> f. Phippa's reasoning is objective because what can be seen is what it is.
> g. none of the above
> h. all of the above
> h2 Phillipa's needs are not defined here
> h3 Phillipa's needs have not been in question here
> h4 Phillipa needs to know what these needs could be, if any so she could have the opportunity to post what she thinks about what you wrote concerning her.
> k. some of the above which are _______________
Some see things as they are and ask why.
I dream of things that never were and ask why not.
- George Bernard Shaw