Psycho-Babble Medication | about biological treatments | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: What is the verdict on post-2003 Nardil?

Posted by SLS on November 29, 2008, at 8:40:10

In reply to What is the verdict on post-2003 Nardil?, posted by Michael Bell on November 23, 2008, at 20:49:57

I found the new Nardil to be roughly equivalent to the old Nardil. It is hard to tell, since my previous exposures to Nardil produced only a partial response. My most recent period of Nardil therapy produced a robust response in combination with the other drugs I am taking. I did not feel that Nardil was without effect. Perhaps one needs to take a bit more of the new formulation to receive the benefit of the old formulation. I needed 90mg last time. The time before that, I seemed to be responsive at 75mg.

I guess the bottom line is that, for me, the two formulations of Nardil seemed to be the same.


- Scott

 

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Medication | Framed

poster:SLS thread:864940
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20081123/msgs/865700.html