Re: It's Treatable. No, it's not./Lamictal's bad

Posted by SLS on November 30, 2006, at 6:16:47

In reply to Re: It's Treatable. No, it's not./Lamictal's bad, posted by SLS on November 30, 2006, at 6:07:11

Perhaps people with affective disorders are more prone to developing cognitive side effects with Lamictal. Here again, though, one study of people with bipolar disorder indicates otherwise, but the dosages used are generally no higher than 200mg.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=16633148&query_hl=1&itool=pubmed_docsum
Perhaps a new thread can be started focusing on this issue.

- Scott

Thread

It's Treatable. No, it's not. Reggie BoStar 11/22/06
...
Re: It's Treatable. No, it's not. » Phillipa cecilia 11/29/06
P.S. cecilia 11/29/06
Re: It's Treatable. No, it's not. » cecilia Declan 11/29/06
Re: It's Treatable. No, it's not. » cecilia linkadge 11/29/06
Re: It's Treatable. No, it's not. linkadge 11/29/06
Re: It's Treatable. No, it's not. » cecilia Phillipa 11/29/06
Re: It's Treatable. No, it's not. » linkadge Phillipa 11/29/06
Re: It's Treatable. No, it's not. » linkadge SLS 11/29/06
Re: It's Treatable. No, it's not. clint878 11/29/06
Re: It's Treatable. No, it's not./Lamictal's bad » stargazer clint878 11/29/06
Re: It's Treatable. No, it's not. Declan 11/29/06
Re: It's Treatable. No, it's not./Lamictal's bad SLS 11/30/06
Re: It's Treatable. No, it's not./Lamictal's bad SLS 11/30/06
Re: It's Treatable. No, it's not./Lamictal's bad stargazer 11/30/06
Re: It's Treatable. No, it's not. FredPotter 11/30/06

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:SLS thread:706067
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20061129/msgs/708904.html

	for
in