Posted by mike lynch on June 21, 2006, at 5:44:41
In reply to Re: Why does adderall suck so much » mike lynch, posted by Ripley Snell on June 21, 2006, at 4:41:52
> > >
> OP:
> > > It's amphetamine, for Lord's sake! I take 80 - 100 mg per day
>
>
>
> Responder:
> > Umm rigght. /
>
> / I know just how you're saying that "rigght,"
> like David Spade, sort of a big eye roll and lots of mugging to the audience. The audience is, together with Spade, so proud of itself it relaxes and actually has not a bad time at the movie. So why tell me "Umm rigght," when I say it's amphetamine?
>
> My point is that it's a heavy drug; it's an amphetamine. No class of stimulants is as strong, despite being called Adderall and Ritalin.
>
> I like people's "I am Albert Einstein with better hair" attitudes. "You are *such* a complete fool that I have to lift my forearms and type in a *correction* so you can *learn*"--"ummm, buh-bye."
>
>
>
> anyway. I've been on a litanly of stimulants in an effort to improve concentration and motivation.
>
>
> That doesn't sound too good either; do you know what "litany" means? It doesn't mean series. It means a long prayer or complaint to God during misfortune. I'm glad you found out that the cure for everything from non-Hodgkin's lymphoma to HIV is right here; we just can't see it yet.
>
> Snell
Ok well your post seems to have been constructed under some heavy amphetamine abuse. I was not questioning the amphetamine, I know it's an amphetamine, I was questioning the 100 mg a day which is a lot, maybe to much, and this theory is just justified by your wierd posts. And with the litany..oh my holy sh*t your right. Anyway I'm going to bed I'm tired
poster:mike lynch
thread:659335
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20060617/msgs/659613.html