Psycho-Babble Medication | about biological treatments | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

NYT ''new trends'' med_empowered

Posted by pseudoname on November 17, 2005, at 6:05:47

In reply to I'm sorry everyone, posted by med_empowered on November 17, 2005, at 1:54:51


I hope I didn't sound as though I was shaking my finger at you for the post that she quoted. Clearly, she would've found another example if you hadn't put a small toe over Bob's line. Your post in fact was much more about how to warn people away from a particular illegal source.

I agree that patient-empowerment psychiatry is a much bigger deal than her drug-diversion angle.

You are right that "the author alleges there is some sort of trend towards self-prescribing without offering up any sort of hard evidence (numbers, quanititative data)." I guess because it *seems* to me personally like there's "more" self-prescribing, I was buying her premise, too, without actually thinking about it. I could ask myself, "More" compared to what?

In Slate's Press Box column a few weeks ago, Jack Shafer criticized the NY Times for asserting numerically unverified "new trends" and using weasel-words like "many" instead of quantitative data. On Sept 20, for example, the Times said there was a new trend for "many" young Ivy-League women to choose babies over careers. Problem? The Times reported the exact same new trend TWENTY-FIVE YEARS AGO!




Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post

Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.


Start a new thread

Google www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Medication | Framed

poster:pseudoname thread:579280