Psycho-Babble Medication | about biological treatments | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: Advice: Selegiline + (Depakote/Seroquel)? » cache-monkey

Posted by chemist on April 26, 2005, at 2:20:34

In reply to Advice: Selegiline + (Depakote/Seroquel)?, posted by cache-monkey on April 26, 2005, at 0:41:02

> Hey all,
>
> So, I need to make some moves in my med regimine. Not feeling so good lately. I'm cycling a little. I think I'm possibly BPII, but this is all cycling amongst the bad stuff: anxiety, dysphoria and depression. Also prominent are anhedonia and asociality. My pdoc has me on Depakote ER 1000 mg/day and Ativan 3 mg/day and I feel more depressed.
>
> At some point I'd like to try low-dose (MAOB selective) selegiline as an add on, which I would like to do at some point regardless. My "normal" state exhibits dysthymia and a reliance on nicotine, so that might be something useful for that.
>
> My anxiety is being kept in check mainly by benzos, and the Depakote isn't really doing much in that department. Nor is it helping my dysphoria. So, Seroquel seems kind of promising for the dysphoria, depression, cycling, and could help against anxiety w/o relying a benzo. (I'm really liking what I've read coming out of Calabrese's recent studies on Seroquel.)
>
> So, I'm thinking either:
> a) just add selegiline to the Depakote
> b) drop Depakote, add seroquel, then see about adding selegiline
> c) keep the Depakote, add seroquel, then see about adding selegiline.
>
> Any advice here? Particularly, has anyone tried selegiline with either Depakote, Seroquel, or possibly both?
>
> Thanks!
> cache-monkey

hello there, me again...you and i read the same authors...i can comment on depakote and seroquel, as well as ativan: my very pleasant run with parnate years back does not quite address your concerns...if i were given your choices above, i would opt for (b), if only because depakote was - for me - a murky walk through muddy waters for a few weeks while my waistline steadily increased. i was dx bpII - this is off the table now, but who knows - and lithium was not an option due to climate and exercise not going with the therapeutic range indicated.

seroquel is, as you likely know, a strange animal, with heavy sedation and histaminergic activity in the 25 to perhaps 100 mg range: when 200 mg and above are titrated, the sedation goes away for the most part and the manic side of bp is addressed first (in my experience and from a bit of reading).

however, your lorazepam will hit harder: seroquel is metabolized by 3A4 (major) and (of course!) 2D6 (minor) , and almost all of the 1,4-benzodiazepines are substrates of 3A4, thus expect competitive binding (at least). the figure i have at hand is that the metabolism of lorazepam is reduced by 20% when taken with seroquel (Lexi-Comp's Drug Information Handbook, 12th Ed., 2004-2005, and not a bad resource). diazepam and clonazepam are also to be dose-adjusted.

my parting shot would be to add the selegiline gradually and decrease the lorazepam as the seroquel is titrated, should you go that route. there ought not be trouble with the benzo/AAP/MAOBI combo other than the 3A4 business with the benzo/AAP.....i see serotonin syndrome fingered if the MAOBI is used in high doses with amphetamine (among others). however, since the amphetamine is a metabolite of the AAP - and unfortunately the l isomer but no matter - i suspect that a qualified psychopharmacologist can set you right if you are not already there! best, chemist


Share
Tweet  

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Medication | Framed

poster:chemist thread:489624
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20050423/msgs/489652.html